Using WebPageTest Have

Using WebPageTest
By:Rick Viscomi,Andy Davies,Marcel Duran
Published on 2015-10-13 by |O'Reilly Media, Inc.|

Learn basic and advanced uses of WebPagetest, the performance measurement tool for optimizing websites. This practical guide shows users new to this tool how run tests and interpret results, and helps experienced users gain a better and more thorough understanding of hidden features in WebPagetest that make testing easier. Written by WebPagetest power users and performance experts, this book will help web developers and frontend engineers solve the problem of slow sites. Topics include: Basic test setup—shows beginners how to get meaningful results Advanced test setup—provides another level of technical depth by explaining features not thoroughly documented at webpagetest.org Analysis of results—helps you understand of how to interpret test results Private instance setup—teaches power users the intricacies of the webpagetest private instance and how it works API and external tools—provides a detailed reference for the API and demonstrates tools already using the API to extend WebPagetest

This Book was ranked at 20 by Google Books for keyword Test.

Book ID of Using WebPageTest's Books is ZnS9CgAAQBAJ, Book which was written byRick Viscomi,Andy Davies,Marcel Duranhave ETAG "x2uMCUdrG5k"

Book which was published by |O'Reilly Media, Inc.| since 2015-10-13 have ISBNs, ISBN 13 Code is 9781491902813 and ISBN 10 Code is 1491902817

Reading Mode in Text Status is false and Reading Mode in Image Status is true

Book which have "214 Pages" is Printed at BOOK under CategoryCOMPUTERS

This Book was rated by Raters and have average rate at ""

This eBook Maturity (Adult Book) status is NOT_MATURE

Book was written in en

eBook Version Availability Status at PDF is falseand in ePub is false

Book Preview

Don't you kind of hate how we have entered the decadent phase of Goodreads whereby perhaps fifty percent (or more) of the reviews written by non-teenagers and non-romancers are now actually bare and unabashed within their variously powerful attempts at being arc, wry, meta, parodic, confessional, and/or snarky? Don't you sort of maple (secretly, in the marrow of one's gut's merry druthers) for the good ol'days of Goodreads (known then as GodFearingGoodlyReading.com) when all opinions were evenly plainspoke Don't you kind of loathe how we've entered the decadent period of Goodreads whereby probably fifty per cent (or more) of the reviews compiled by non-teenagers and non-romancers are actually bare and unabashed inside their variously effective efforts at being arch, wry, meta, parodic, confessional, and/or snarky? Don't you type of wood (secretly, in the marrow of one's gut's merry druthers) for the great ol'times of Goodreads (known then as GodFearingGoodlyReading.com) when all reviews were consistently plainspoken, only effective, unpretentious, and -- especially otherwise -- dull, boring, boring? Do not you kind of loathe when persons state'don't you think in this way or experience like that'in an endeavor to goad you equally psychologically and grammatically in to accepting using them? In the language of ABBA: I do, I do, I do(, I actually do, I do). Well, as the interwebs is really a earth in which yesteryear stands shoulder-to-shoulder with the current (and with fetish porn), we are able to revisit the past in their inviolable presentness any moment we wish. Or at the least until this website ultimately tanks. Consider (won't you?) Matt Nieberle's overview of Macbeth in their entirety. I've destined it with much rope and pulled it here for your perusal. (Please recognize that many a sic are intended in the next reviews.) its really complex and silly! why cant we be examining like Romeo and Juliet?!?! at the very least that book is good! There you've it. Refreshingly, not just a review published in one of many witch's voices or alluding to Hillary and Bill Clinton or discussing the reviewer's first period. Just a primal scream unleashed in to the dark wilderness of the cosmos.Yes, Mr. Nieberle is (probably) a teen, but I admire his capability to strongarm the temptation to be clever or ironic. (Don't you?) He speaks the native language of the idk generation with an economy and an understanding that renders his convictions much more emphatic. Here's MICHAEL's report on exactly the same play. You could'know'MICHAEL; he's the'Problems Architect'at Goodreads. (A problematic title itself in that it implies he designs problems... which can be the case, for all I know.) This book shouldn't be required reading... reading plays that you never want to see is awful. Reading a play kinda sucks to begin with, if it was designed to be read, then it will be a novel, not really a play. Along with that the teach had us students browse the play aloud (on person for every single character for a couple pages). None of us had read the play before. None of us wanted to read it (I made the mistake of taking the'easy'english class for 6 years). The teacher picked students that appeared to be they weren't paying attention. All of this compounded to produce me virtually hate reading classics for something such as 10 years (granted macbeth alone wasn't the problem). I also hate iambic pentameter. Pure activism there. STOP the mandatory reading of plays. It's wrong, morally and academically. And it also can really fuck up your GPA. There's no wasteful extravagance in this editorial... no fanfare, no fireworks, no linked photos of half-naked, oiled-up, big-bosomed starlets, no invented dialogues between mcdougal and the review-writer. It's simple and memorable. Being required to read plays is wrong, and if you require anyone, under duress, to read a play you then have sinned and are going to hell, in the event that you believe in hell. If not, you're going to the DMV. I'm also tired of all you could smug spelling snobs. You damnable fascists along with your new-fangled dictionaries and your fancy-schmancy spell check. Sometimes the passionate immediacy of a note overcomes its spelling limitations. Also, in this age when we are taught to respect each other's differences, this indicates offensively egocentric and mean-spirited you may anticipate others tokowtow for a petty linguistic rules. Inventive phrase is going to free alone it doesn't matter how you attempt to shackle it. That is ones stick, Aubrey. Around the judgment, a engage in Macbeth was a worste peice possibly compiled by Shakespeare, this also says a reasonable amount thinking about i also read through his or her Romeo in addition to Juliet. Ontop involving it is witout a doubt amazing plot, naive personas as well as absolutly discusting pair of ethics, Shakespeare candidly portrays Girl Macbeth because the real vilian within the play. Thinking of she actually is mearly your style with the back game in addition to Macbeth themselves is usually truely doing the particular repulsive offenses, as well as tough and also fraud, I can't realize why it is so effortless to imagine in which Macbeth would certainly be prepared to do great as an alternative to malignant if perhaps his girl ended up additional possitive. I do think this play can be uterally unrealistic. Nonetheless the following is in no way your ne plus ultra with classic book reviewing. Although succinct along with with virtually no stealing attention tendency in order to coyness or perhaps cuteness, Jo's critique alludes with a resentment and so powerful it is inexpressible. 1 imagines some Signet Typical Models compromised for you to chunks by using pruning shears within Jo's vicinity. I detest this kind of play. It's that I can't possibly offer you any analogies and also similes in respect of what amount I not like it. A great incrementally snarkier form will often have claimed anything like...'I dispise this particular perform similar to a simile I am unable to surface with.' Certainly not Jo. She converse the live, undecorated truth of the matter not fit with regard to figurative language. As well as there is nothing wrong by using that. As soon as around an awesome while, when you buy neck-deep within dandified pomo hijinks, it is an excellent wallow inside hog dog pen that you are itchin'for. Thanks a lot, Jo. I really like your futile holding in similes that can not strategy your bilious hate within your heart. You might be mine, in addition to My business is yours. Figuratively talking, with course. And after this the following is this assessment: Macbeth by means of Bill Shakespeare is the best literary operate inside British language, as well as anyone who disagrees is usually an asshole including a dumbhead.