F for Effort Read

F for Effort
By:Richard Benson
Published on 2012-06-29 by Chronicle Books

From the author of the national bestseller F in Exams comes a brand new compendium of hilarious and inventive wrong test answers and homework hiccups. Featuring gems from elementary school (|two halves make a whale|), middle grades (Q: What does |germinate| mean? A: To become a German citizen), and high school (Q: Fossil fuels are usually associated with which major type of rock? A: Classic rock), these 250 examples of creative invention are sure to charm anyone who has had to bluff or blunder their way through a test.

This Book was ranked at 11 by Google Books for keyword Test.

Book ID of F for Effort's Books is aOlSdG3bi2EC, Book which was written byRichard Bensonhave ETAG "J9A/wnyOOww"

Book which was published by Chronicle Books since 2012-06-29 have ISBNs, ISBN 13 Code is 9781452119267 and ISBN 10 Code is 1452119260

Reading Mode in Text Status is true and Reading Mode in Image Status is true

Book which have "128 Pages" is Printed at BOOK under CategoryHumor

This Book was rated by 9 Raters and have average rate at "4.5"

This eBook Maturity (Adult Book) status is NOT_MATURE

Book was written in en

eBook Version Availability Status at PDF is true and in ePub is true

Book Preview

Do not you sort of hate how we have joined the decadent stage of Goodreads when probably fifty percent (or more) of the evaluations published by non-teenagers and non-romancers are now actually nude and unabashed within their variously powerful efforts at being arch, wry, meta, parodic, confessional, and/or snarky? Don't you kind of wood (secretly, in the marrow of your gut's happy druthers) for the nice ol'days of Goodreads (known then as GodFearingGoodlyReading.com) when all evaluations were consistently plainspoke Don't you type of loathe how we have joined the decadent period of Goodreads where possibly fifty per cent (or more) of the reviews compiled by non-teenagers and non-romancers are now actually nude and unabashed in their variously efficient efforts at being arc, wry, meta, parodic, confessional, and/or snarky? Don't you kind of maple (secretly, in the marrow of one's gut's happy druthers) for the nice ol'times of Goodreads (known then as GodFearingGoodlyReading.com) when all evaluations were consistently plainspoken, merely functional, unpretentious, and -- most importantly otherwise -- dull, boring, dull? Don't you kind of loathe when people state'don't you think in this manner or feel that way'in an attempt to goad you both psychologically and grammatically in to accepting with them? In the language of ABBA: I really do, I actually do, I do(, I really do, I do). Effectively, because the interwebs is really a earth where yesteryear stands shoulder-to-shoulder with the present (and with fetish porn), we could revisit days gone by in its inviolable presentness any time we wish. Or at least until this amazing site eventually tanks. Contemplate (won't you?) Matt Nieberle's review of Macbeth in their entirety. I have bound it with huge rope and pulled it here for your perusal. (Please realize that many a sic are intended in the next reviews.) their actually difficult and foolish! why cant we be studying like Romeo and Juliet?!?! at the least that book is great! There you've it. Refreshingly, not a evaluation written in among the witch's voices or alluding to Hillary and Bill Clinton or discussing the reviewer's first period. Only a primal shout unleashed to the dark wilderness of the cosmos.Yes, Mr. Nieberle is (probably) a teen, but I admire his ability to strongarm the temptation to be clever or ironic. (Don't you?) He speaks the native language of the idk generation with an economy and an understanding that renders his convictions much more emphatic. Here's MICHAEL's review of the same play. You may'know'MICHAEL; he's the'Problems Architect'only at Goodreads. (A problematic title itself in that it implies that he designs problems... which can be the case, for several I know.) This book shouldn't be required reading... reading plays that you do not want to learn is awful. Reading a play kinda sucks to begin with, if it had been meant to be read, then it would have been a novel, not a play. On top of that the teach had us students browse the play aloud (on person for every single character for a few pages). None folks had see the play before. None people wanted to read it (I made the mistake of taking the'easy'english class for 6 years). The teacher picked students that appeared as if they weren't paying attention. This compounded to make me more or less hate reading classics for something such as 10 years (granted macbeth alone wasn't the problem). I also hate iambic pentameter. Pure activism there. STOP the mandatory reading of plays. It's wrong, morally and academically. And it also can actually fuck up your GPA. There's no wasteful extravagance in this editorial... no fanfare, no fireworks, no linked photos of half-naked, oiled-up, big-bosomed starlets, no invented dialogues between the writer and the review-writer. It's simple and memorable. Being required to see plays is wrong, and in the event that you require anyone, under duress, to read a play then you definitely have sinned and are likely to hell, if you rely on hell. If not, you're likely to the DMV. I am also fed up with all you smug spelling snobs. You damnable fascists with your new-fangled dictionaries and your fancy-schmancy spell check. Sometimes the passionate immediacy of an email overcomes its spelling limitations. Also, in this age when we are taught to respect each other's differences, it appears offensively egocentric and mean-spirited you may anticipate others tokowtow for a petty linguistic rules. Creative appearance can no cost itself regardless of how you attempt so that you can shackle it. That's your current sign, Aubrey. Around my very own judgment, your enjoy Macbeth had been the particular worste peice ever before written by Shakespeare, which says considerably taking into consideration in addition, i go through his or her Romeo along with Juliet. Ontop of it truly is by now amazing story, unlikely personas and also absolutly discusting list of ethics, Shakespeare candidly shows Female Macbeth as the correct vilian inside the play. Thinking about the girl with mearly a tone of voice in the trunk circular and also Macbeth themselves will be truely choosing the particular horrible criminal offenses, as well as hard along with fraud, I do not understand why it's very uncomplicated to believe this Macbeth would certainly be inclined to complete great in lieu of evil but only if his wife were being a lot more possitive. I do think that enjoy is definitely uterally unrealistic. But the examples below is by far a ne additionally really regarding classic book reviewing. Even though succinct and without having distracting interest to be able to coyness or perhaps cuteness, Jo's examine alludes with a indignation and so powerful it's inexpressible. One imagines a couple of Signet Vintage Editions compromised to be able to parts along with pruning shears with Jo's vicinity. I dispise this play. A case in point which I can not even supply you with any analogies or perhaps similes with regards to the amount We despise it. A strong incrementally snarkier style probably have reported one thing like...'I don't really like this particular have fun with just like a simile I cannot appear with.' Not necessarily Jo. The woman talks your raw, undecorated simple fact unhealthy to get figurative language. Along with there is no problem together with that. When in a great even though, when you're getting neck-deep inside dandified pomo hijinks, it truly is a pleasant wallow inside pig coop you're itchin'for. Appreciate it, Jo. I like anyone with a futile grasping from similes of which are unable to method your bilious hatred with your heart. You are my own, plus We are yours. Figuratively discussing, associated with course. And today the following is my own assessment: Macbeth simply by William Shakespeare is the foremost fictional operate from the English vocabulary, and also anyone that disagrees can be an asshole plus a dumbhead.