Angular Test-Driven Development look at

Angular Test-Driven Development
By:Md. Ziaul Haq
Published on 2017-02-08 by Packt Publishing Ltd

Enhance your testing skills to build powerful and fault-free applications in Angular v4 About This Book Learn test-driven development (TDD) for JavaScript Improve your Karma and Protractor expertise by setting up an Angular test suite A wide range of testing techniques for professional Angular applications accompanied by practical examples Who This Book Is For This book is for developers who have experience with Angular but want to understand the wider context of when, why, and how to apply testing techniques and best practices to create quality clean code. To get the most out of this book, you should have a good understanding of HTML and JavaScript and a basic understanding of Angular. What You Will Learn Get a clear overview of TDD in the context of JavaScript with a brief look at testing techniques, tools, and frameworks Get an overview of Karma and create test suites for an Angular application Install and configure Protractor for Angular and explore a few important Protractor APIs Understand automated testing and implement headless automated tests with Karma Implement testing techniques with mocks, broadcast events, and asynchronous behavior Integrate REST-based services and APIs into an application to extract data Automate Karma unit tests with Travis CI In Detail This is a complete guide that shows you testing techniques with Karma that will help you perform unit testing and end-to-end testing with Protractor. It will show you how to optimize your Angular development process using TDD techniques and ensure your final project is free of bugs. All examples in this book are based on Angular v2 and are compatible with Angular v4. We start by reviewing the TDD life cycle, TDD in the context of JavaScript, and various JavaScript test tools and frameworks. You will see how Karma and Protractor can make your life easier while running JavaScript unit tests. We will enable you to build a test suite for an Angular application and build a testable medium-to-large scale Angular application by handling REST API data. Building on the initial foundational aspects, we move on to testing for multiple classes, partial views, location references, CSS, and the HTML element. In addition, we will explore how to use a headless browser with Karma. We will also configure a Karma file to automate the testing and tackle elements of Angular (components, services, classes, and broadcasting) using TDD. Finally, you will find out how to pull data using an external API, set up and configure Protractor to use a standalone Selenium server, and set up Travis CI and Karma to test your application. Style and approach This book is a complete guide to Angular unit testing techniques using Karma and performing end-to-end testing with Protractor.

This Book was ranked at 4 by Google Books for keyword Test.

Book ID of Angular Test-Driven Development's Books is -VMoDwAAQBAJ, Book which was written byMd. Ziaul Haqhave ETAG "gdwer6Pet9Q"

Book which was published by Packt Publishing Ltd since 2017-02-08 have ISBNs, ISBN 13 Code is 9781786462763 and ISBN 10 Code is 1786462761

Reading Mode in Text Status is true and Reading Mode in Image Status is true

Book which have "252 Pages" is Printed at BOOK under CategoryComputers

This Book was rated by Raters and have average rate at ""

This eBook Maturity (Adult Book) status is NOT_MATURE

Book was written in en

eBook Version Availability Status at PDF is trueand in ePub is true

Book Preview

Don't you sort of loathe how we have joined the decadent period of Goodreads when possibly fifty percent (or more) of the opinions published by non-teenagers and non-romancers are actually nude and unabashed within their variously efficient attempts at being arch, wry, meta, parodic, confessional, and/or snarky? Don't you sort of maple (secretly, in the marrow of one's gut's merry druthers) for the nice ol'days of Goodreads (known then as GodFearingGoodlyReading.com) when all opinions were evenly plainspoke Don't you kind of hate how we have joined the decadent phase of Goodreads whereby perhaps fifty per cent (or more) of the opinions published by non-teenagers and non-romancers are now actually bare and unabashed in their variously powerful efforts at being arch, wry, meta, parodic, confessional, and/or snarky? Don't you kind of wood (secretly, in the marrow of one's gut's happy druthers) for the good ol'times of Goodreads (known then as GodFearingGoodlyReading.com) when all evaluations were consistently plainspoken, just practical, unpretentious, and -- above all else -- boring, boring, boring? Do not you sort of hate when people say'don't you think this way or experience this way'in an endeavor to goad you both psychologically and grammatically in to accepting together? In the words of ABBA: I actually do, I really do, I do(, I actually do, I do). Effectively, as the interwebs is really a world where yesteryear stands shoulder-to-shoulder with the present (and with fetish porn), we are able to review yesteryear in their inviolable presentness any time we wish. Or at the least till this amazing site finally tanks. Consider (won't you?) Matt Nieberle's report on Macbeth in its entirety. I have destined it with much rope and pulled it here for the perusal. (Please understand that many a sic are recommended in these reviews.) their really complicated and foolish! why cant we be studying like Romeo and Juliet?!?! at the least that guide is good! There you've it. Refreshingly, not really a review written in one of many witch's sounds or alluding to Hillary and Statement Clinton or discussing the reviewer's first period. Just a primal shout unleashed in to the dark wilderness of the cosmos.Yes, Mr. Nieberle is (probably) a teenager, but I admire his capability to strongarm the temptation to be clever or ironic. (Don't you?) He speaks the native language of the idk generation having an economy and an understanding that renders his convictions much more emphatic. Here's MICHAEL's overview of the same play. You could'know'MICHAEL; he is the'Problems Architect'only at Goodreads. (A problematic title itself in so it implies that he designs problems... which can be the case, for several I know.) This book shouldn't be required reading... reading plays that that you don't want to learn is awful. Reading a play kinda sucks to start with, if it had been meant to be read, then it will be a novel, not a play. On top of that the teach had us students see the play aloud (on person for every character for a few pages). None people had read the play before. None people wanted to see it (I made the mistake of taking the'easy'english class for 6 years). The teacher picked students that looked like they weren't paying attention. All of this compounded to make me pretty much hate reading classics for something similar to 10 years (granted macbeth alone wasn't the problem). I also hate iambic pentameter. Pure activism there. STOP the mandatory reading of plays. It's wrong, morally and academically. And yes it can definitely fuck up your GPA. There's no wasteful extravagance in this editorial... no fanfare, no fireworks, no linked photos of half-naked, oiled-up, big-bosomed starlets, no invented dialogues between mcdougal and the review-writer. It's simple and memorable. Being required to see plays is wrong, and in the event that you require anyone, under duress, to read a play then you have sinned and are likely to hell, in the event that you believe in hell. If not, you're likely to the DMV. I'm also tired of whatever you smug spelling snobs. You damnable fascists along with your new-fangled dictionaries and your fancy-schmancy spell check. Sometimes the passionate immediacy of an email overcomes its spelling limitations. Also, in this age whenever we are taught to respect each other's differences, it seems offensively egocentric and mean-spirited you may anticipate others tokowtow on your petty linguistic rules. Inventive expression will totally free by itself regardless how you try in order to shackle it. That's your current stick, Aubrey. In the thoughts and opinions, the enjoy Macbeth was the particular worste peice at any time authored by Shakespeare, this is saying quite a bit contemplating i additionally understand their Romeo and Juliet. Ontop connected with it can be already astounding plot, unrealistic personas in addition to absolutly discusting list of ethics, Shakespeare publicly shows Lady Macbeth because the real vilian while in the play. Thinking about jane is mearly the actual style within the trunk around and Macbeth themself can be truely carrying out this horrible violations, as well as kill in addition to fraudulence, I do not discover why it's extremely quick to believe that Macbeth might be willing to do beneficial rather then evil only when the girlfriend were being additional possitive. I do think until this engage in will be uterally unrealistic. Nevertheless the following is certainly your ne furthermore super regarding typical guide reviewing. Though succinct as well as with virtually no unproductive desire to help coyness and also cuteness, Jo's critique alludes into a resentment consequently powerful it's inexpressible. Just one imagines a couple of Signet Vintage Models broken in to to help portions having pruning shears throughout Jo's vicinity. I don't really like this kind of play. So much so in which I can not actually give you virtually any analogies or even similes as to how much We hate it. A good incrementally snarkier variety will often have stated a thing like...'I dispise this specific engage in being a simile I can not show up with.' Not really Jo. The girl talks a new uncooked, undecorated fact not fit intended for figurative language. Along with there is no problem together with that. One time in an excellent even though, when you're getting neck-deep within dandified pomo hijinks, it truly is an excellent wallow within the hog pencil you're itchin'for. Thanks, Jo. I love mom and her futile holding with similes in which won't be able to solution the bilious hatred within your heart. You might be acquire, in addition to My business is yours. Figuratively chatting, of course. And today here i will discuss my personal review: Macbeth by way of William Shakespeare is best fictional work while in the British terminology, as well as anyone who disagrees is surely an asshole and a dumbhead.