Modern C++ Programming with Test-Driven Development look at

Modern C++ Programming with Test-Driven Development
By:Jeff Langr
Published on 2013-10-10 by Pragmatic Bookshelf

If you program in C++ you've been neglected. Test-driven development (TDD) is a modern software development practice that can dramatically reduce the number of defects in systems, produce more maintainable code, and give you the confidence to change your software to meet changing needs. But C++ programmers have been ignored by those promoting TDD--until now. In this book, Jeff Langr gives you hands-on lessons in the challenges and rewards of doing TDD in C++. Modern C++ Programming With Test-Driven Development, the only comprehensive treatment on TDD in C++ provides you with everything you need to know about TDD, and the challenges and benefits of implementing it in your C++ systems. Its many detailed code examples take you step-by-step from TDD basics to advanced concepts. As a veteran C++ programmer, you're already writing high-quality code, and you work hard to maintain code quality. It doesn't have to be that hard. In this book, you'll learn: how to use TDD to improve legacy C++ systems how to identify and deal with troublesome system dependencies how to do dependency injection, which is particularly tricky in C++ how to use testing tools for C++ that aid TDD new C++11 features that facilitate TDD As you grow in TDD mastery, you'll discover how to keep a massive C++ system from becoming a design mess over time, as well as particular C++ trouble spots to avoid. You'll find out how to prevent your tests from being a maintenance burden and how to think in TDD without giving up your hard-won C++ skills. Finally, you'll see how to grow and sustain TDD in your team. Whether you're a complete unit-testing novice or an experienced tester, this book will lead you to mastery of test-driven development in C++. What You Need A C++ compiler running under Windows or Linux, preferably one that supports C++11. Examples presented in the book were built under gcc 4.7.2. Google Mock 1.6 (downloadable for free; it contains Google Test as well) or an alternate C++ unit testing tool. Most examples in the book are written for Google Mock, but it isn't difficult to translate them to your tool of choice. A good programmer's editor or IDE. cmake, preferably. Of course, you can use your own preferred make too. CMakeLists.txt files are provided for each project. Examples provided were built using cmake version 2.8.9. Various freely-available third-party libraries are used as the basis for examples in the book. These include: cURL JsonCpp Boost (filesystem, date_time/gregorian, algorithm, assign) Several examples use the boost headers/libraries. Only one example uses cURL and JsonCpp.

This Book was ranked at 36 by Google Books for keyword Test.

Book ID of Modern C++ Programming with Test-Driven Development's Books is GA9QDwAAQBAJ, Book which was written byJeff Langrhave ETAG "BEVVwInGWl8"

Book which was published by Pragmatic Bookshelf since 2013-10-10 have ISBNs, ISBN 13 Code is 9781680504026 and ISBN 10 Code is 1680504029

Reading Mode in Text Status is true and Reading Mode in Image Status is true

Book which have "368 Pages" is Printed at BOOK under CategoryComputers

This Book was rated by Raters and have average rate at ""

This eBook Maturity (Adult Book) status is NOT_MATURE

Book was written in en

eBook Version Availability Status at PDF is true and in ePub is true

Book Preview

Don't you sort of loathe how we have joined the decadent stage of Goodreads whereby probably fifty per cent (or more) of the opinions compiled by non-teenagers and non-romancers are now actually naked and unabashed inside their variously effective efforts at being arch, wry, meta, parodic, confessional, and/or snarky? Don't you kind of maple (secretly, in the marrow of one's gut's merry druthers) for the nice ol'days of Goodreads (known then as GodFearingGoodlyReading.com) when all evaluations were consistently plainspoke Do not you type of loathe how we've joined the decadent stage of Goodreads whereby perhaps fifty % (or more) of the reviews compiled by non-teenagers and non-romancers are now naked and unabashed inside their variously powerful efforts at being arch, wry, meta, parodic, confessional, and/or snarky? Do not you kind of wood (secretly, in the marrow of your gut's merry druthers) for the good ol'days of Goodreads (known then as GodFearingGoodlyReading.com) when all evaluations were evenly plainspoken, simply functional, unpretentious, and -- most importantly else -- dull, dull, boring? Don't you type of hate when persons claim'don't you believe this way or experience this way'in an effort to goad you both psychologically and grammatically into accepting using them? In the words of ABBA: I really do, I actually do, I do(, I actually do, I do). Well, because the interwebs is just a earth where the past stands shoulder-to-shoulder with the present (and with fetish porn), we are able to review yesteryear in its inviolable presentness any moment we wish. Or at the least till this amazing site ultimately tanks. Consider (won't you?) Matt Nieberle's overview of Macbeth in its entirety. I have destined it with huge rope and drawn it here for the perusal. (Please realize that several a sic are recommended in the next reviews.) its really complex and silly! why cant we be reading like Romeo and Juliet?!?! at the least that book is excellent! There you've it. Refreshingly, not really a review written in one of many witch's voices or alluding to Hillary and Statement Clinton or discussing the reviewer's first period. Only a primal yell unleashed to the dark wilderness of the cosmos.Yes, Mr. Nieberle is (probably) a teen, but I admire his capability to strongarm the temptation to be clever or ironic. (Don't you?) He speaks the native language of the idk generation having an economy and a quality that renders his convictions all the more emphatic. Here's MICHAEL's overview of the same play. You could'know'MICHAEL; he's the'Problems Architect'here at Goodreads. (A problematic title itself in that it implies that he designs problems... that will be the case, for several I know.) This book shouldn't be required reading... reading plays that you do not want to read is awful. Reading a play kinda sucks to start with, if it absolutely was meant to be read, then it will be a novel, not really a play. Along with that the teach had us students browse the play aloud (on person for every character for a few pages). None people had browse the play before. None of us wanted to learn it (I made the mistake of taking the'easy'english class for 6 years). The teacher picked students that appeared to be they weren't paying attention. All this compounded to create me more or less hate reading classics for something such as 10 years (granted macbeth alone wasn't the problem). I also hate iambic pentameter. Pure activism there. STOP the mandatory reading of plays. It's wrong, morally and academically. And yes it can definitely fuck up your GPA. There's no wasteful extravagance in this editorial... no fanfare, no fireworks, no linked photos of half-naked, oiled-up, big-bosomed starlets, no invented dialogues between the author and the review-writer. It's simple and memorable. Being required to read plays is wrong, and in the event that you require anyone, under duress, to learn a play then you have sinned and are going to hell, if you rely on hell. Or even, you're planning to the DMV. I am also tired of whatever you smug spelling snobs. You damnable fascists with your new-fangled dictionaries and your fancy-schmancy spell check. Sometimes the passionate immediacy of a note overcomes its spelling limitations. Also, in this age when we are taught to respect each other's differences, it seems offensively egocentric and mean-spirited to anticipate others tokowtow on your small linguistic rules. Artsy term is going to free of charge by itself regardless how you might try to shackle it. That's your signal, Aubrey. Around my very own viewpoint, the particular enjoy Macbeth ended up being the worste peice actually created by Shakespeare, and this also is saying considerably considering i additionally examine his / her Romeo in addition to Juliet. Ontop regarding it truly is currently astounding plot of land, improbable people and absolutly discusting range of morals, Shakespeare freely molds Woman Macbeth since the genuine vilian in the play. Looking at the girl with mearly a style inside your back circular along with Macbeth herself is usually truely choosing the repulsive offences, like kill as well as scam, I really don't discover why it is so effortless to visualize this Macbeth could be inclined to try and do excellent as an alternative to bad if perhaps his or her spouse had been a lot more possitive. I really believe that your engage in is usually uterally unrealistic. Nonetheless this is certainly the ne furthermore really associated with timeless guide reviewing. Even though succinct and also without the distracting trend to help coyness and also cuteness, Jo's evaluate alludes to your resentment hence outstanding that it's inexpressible. Just one imagines several Signet Traditional Models broken into to help parts together with pruning shears in Jo's vicinity. I detest this play. So much in fact which I cannot perhaps give you any analogies or similes about how much I actually despise it. The incrementally snarkier style probably have stated a thing like...'I personally don't like this kind of perform such as a simile Could not show up with.' Not necessarily Jo. Your woman speaks the organic, undecorated reality unfit regarding figurative language. And also there is no problem using that. The moment around an incredible when, when you buy neck-deep throughout dandified pomo hijinks, it really is a pleasant wallow from the hog pencil you're itchin'for. Many thanks, Jo. I love you and your ineffective learning in similes this are unable to approach the actual bilious hate inside your heart. You're my very own, and We are yours. Figuratively chatting, with course. And today here i will discuss my personal examine: Macbeth by way of William Shakespeare is the foremost fictional perform while in the English terminology, plus anyone that disagrees is an asshole and a dumbhead.