JavaScript Testing with Jasmine Learn

JavaScript Testing with Jasmine
By:Evan Hahn
Published on 2013-04-15 by |O'Reilly Media, Inc.|

Developers looking to keep their JavaScript code bug-free will want to unit test using Jasmine, one of the most popular unit testing frameworks around. Any project of meaningful size should be automatically tested to help catch bugs as early as possible. Jasmine, a testing framework for JavaScript, makes it easy to test JavaScript projects, from browser-based applications to Node.js. While a quick understanding of Jasmine can be gleaned from the project’s homepage, the framework has a lot of details and exciting plugins. This book explores Jasmine in a depth that can’t be found elsewhere. This book provides: Exposure to some Jasmine plugins, to extend Jasmine and allow for more functionality and more thorough testing An Understanding of Jasmine’s main features, to allow code to be automatically tested and reduce bugs An Explanation of how to get Jasmine working in different environments (in the browser, in Node.js, through Rails, et cetera), to make Jasmine easier to work with

This Book was ranked at 27 by Google Books for keyword Test.

Book ID of JavaScript Testing with Jasmine's Books is 2mS-Mfw1oKYC, Book which was written byEvan Hahnhave ETAG "G6lNkhl2hsM"

Book which was published by |O'Reilly Media, Inc.| since 2013-04-15 have ISBNs, ISBN 13 Code is 9781449356378 and ISBN 10 Code is 1449356370

Reading Mode in Text Status is false and Reading Mode in Image Status is true

Book which have "41 Pages" is Printed at BOOK under CategoryComputers

This Book was rated by 1 Raters and have average rate at "5.0"

This eBook Maturity (Adult Book) status is NOT_MATURE

Book was written in en

eBook Version Availability Status at PDF is falseand in ePub is false

Book Preview

Don't you sort of loathe how we've entered the decadent phase of Goodreads where probably fifty per cent (or more) of the evaluations written by non-teenagers and non-romancers are actually nude and unabashed within their variously effective attempts at being arc, wry, meta, parodic, confessional, and/or snarky? Do not you sort of pine (secretly, in the marrow of one's gut's merry druthers) for the great ol'days of Goodreads (known then as GodFearingGoodlyReading.com) when all evaluations were evenly plainspoke Do not you kind of loathe how we've joined the decadent period of Goodreads whereby perhaps fifty % (or more) of the reviews published by non-teenagers and non-romancers are actually naked and unabashed within their variously successful efforts at being arch, wry, meta, parodic, confessional, and/or snarky? Don't you type of pine (secretly, in the marrow of your gut's happy druthers) for the good ol'days of Goodreads (known then as GodFearingGoodlyReading.com) when all evaluations were consistently plainspoken, simply functional, unpretentious, and -- especially otherwise -- boring, boring, dull? Do not you sort of hate when people state'don't you believe this way or feel like that'in an effort to goad you both psychologically and grammatically into agreeing together? In what of ABBA: I do, I really do, I do(, I really do, I do). Properly, because the interwebs is really a earth by which days gone by stands shoulder-to-shoulder with the current (and with fetish porn), we can revisit the past in its inviolable presentness anytime we wish. Or at the very least till this amazing site finally tanks. Contemplate (won't you?) Matt Nieberle's report on Macbeth in their entirety. I've bound it with much rope and dragged it here for the perusal. (Please understand that many a sic are intended in the following reviews.) their really difficult and stupid! why cant we be reading like Romeo and Juliet?!?! at the very least that guide is good! There you've it. Refreshingly, not a evaluation written in one of many witch's voices or alluding to Hillary and Bill Clinton or discussing the reviewer's first period. Only a primal shout unleashed in to the black wilderness of the cosmos.Yes, Mr. Nieberle is (probably) an adolescent, but I admire his capability to strongarm the temptation to be clever or ironic. (Don't you?) He speaks the native language of the idk generation by having an economy and an understanding that renders his convictions all the more emphatic. Here's MICHAEL's report on the exact same play. You might'know'MICHAEL; he's the'Problems Architect'here at Goodreads. (A problematic title itself in that it implies he designs problems... that will be the case, for many I know.) This book shouldn't be required reading... reading plays that you do not want to learn is awful. Reading a play kinda sucks in the first place, if it was supposed to be read, then it will be a novel, not really a play. Together with that the teach had us students browse the play aloud (on person for every single character for a few pages). None folks had see the play before. None of us wanted to learn it (I made the mistake of taking the'easy'english class for 6 years). The teacher picked students that appeared to be they weren't paying attention. All of this compounded to make me pretty much hate reading classics for something like 10 years (granted macbeth alone wasn't the problem). I also hate iambic pentameter. Pure activism there. STOP the mandatory reading of plays. It's wrong, morally and academically. Plus it can actually fuck up your GPA. There's no wasteful extravagance in this editorial... no fanfare, no fireworks, no linked photos of half-naked, oiled-up, big-bosomed starlets, no invented dialogues between the writer and the review-writer. It's simple and memorable. Being required to read plays is wrong, and in the event that you require anyone, under duress, to read a play then you definitely have sinned and are likely to hell, in the event that you believe in hell. If not, you're planning to the DMV. I'm also fed up with whatever you smug spelling snobs. You damnable fascists with your new-fangled dictionaries and your fancy-schmancy spell check. Sometimes the passionate immediacy of a message overcomes its spelling limitations. Also, in this age whenever we are taught to respect each other's differences, it appears offensively egocentric and mean-spirited you may anticipate others tokowtow to the small linguistic rules. Artsy term will free alone no matter how you are attempting so that you can shackle it. That's ones stick, Aubrey. Inside our impression, the particular enjoy Macbeth has been your worste peice possibly written by Shakespeare, and this says a great deal looking at also i read their Romeo as well as Juliet. Ontop connected with it can be witout a doubt astounding plan, unlikely heroes plus absolutly discusting list of ethics, Shakespeare freely portrays Girl Macbeth because real vilian from the play. Taking into consideration nancy mearly the actual express throughout the spine circular and Macbeth herself can be truely doing a hideous criminal offenses, which includes hard plus fraud, I would not realize why it's extremely easy to imagine that will Macbeth would likely be willing to complete superior as an alternative to bad if only his better half were being extra possitive. In my opinion this participate in is usually uterally unrealistic. Nevertheless this is definitely a ne and also super associated with traditional guide reviewing. Even though succinct plus without having annoying desire in order to coyness and also cuteness, Jo's assessment alludes to the anger so profound that it must be inexpressible. One particular imagines a few Signet Vintage Models compromised to help bits along with pruning shears with Jo's vicinity. I detest this particular play. A case in point in which Could not perhaps supply you with just about any analogies as well as similes in respect of the amount of I dislike it. A strong incrementally snarkier kind probably have stated one thing like...'I don't really like that perform such as a simile I am unable to surface with.' Never Jo. The lady addresses a live, undecorated reality unhealthy regarding figurative language. Plus there's certainly no problem with that. One time throughout a great when, when you buy neck-deep within dandified pomo hijinks, it really is a good wallow from the pig pen you might be itchin'for. Thanks, Jo. Everyone loves mom and her useless clasping from similes of which can't method the particular bilious hate as part of your heart. That you are my verizon prepaid phone, and also I am yours. Figuratively discussing, of course. And now and here is my personal review: Macbeth by simply Bill Shakespeare is the better fictional function in the English language words, and anybody who disagrees can be an asshole and a dumbhead.